Spherical Aberration: Start Here

A photographic lens is asked to turn each point in a scene into a point in the image. In a real lens, rays passing through different parts of the aperture do not always come to focus at exactly the same distance. That pupil-zone disagreement is called spherical aberration.1 2

The effect is often introduced as a source of softness at large apertures, but it can do more than make an image less sharp. It can place a crisp core inside a broader glow, move the most useful focus as the aperture changes, and make foreground and background blur behave differently. Lens designers may suppress it, balance it against other aberrations, or retain a controlled amount for a particular rendering effect.

The two articles in this series explain the same subject at different depths.

The Idea in One Minute

  • Different aperture zones can prefer different focus positions. Near-axis rays, middle-zone rays, and marginal rays do not necessarily agree.
  • The image plane must choose among them. "Best focus" depends on whether the priority is the smallest blur, strongest central intensity, highest contrast, or the photographer's visual judgment.
  • Stopping down changes which zones participate. It usually reduces the visible effect by blocking outer rays, but it can also move the best-focus plane.
  • Foreground and background can exchange rendering tendencies. Under one correction state, background points may have softer edges while foreground points become more outlined; reversing the correction exchanges those tendencies.
  • A residual is not automatically a mistake. Some lenses deliberately create a core-and-halo soft-focus effect or let the photographer adjust the foreground–background balance.2 3

Choose the Version That Fits the Question

ArticleBest forWhat it covers
Spherical Aberration for PhotographersReaders who want the practical idea without equationsWhat the aberration looks like, why aperture matters, how foreground and background differ, and how several well-known lenses use it
Spherical Aberration: From Optical Error to Creative Design ToolReaders who want the complete optical treatmentLongitudinal, transverse, and wavefront descriptions; higher-order and zonal behavior; diffraction; focus criteria; spherochromatism; design methods; mathematical and historical appendices

The concise guide is the better starting point for photography and lens use. The technical article is intended for readers interpreting aberration plots, patents, prescriptions, diffraction behavior, or variable-aberration lens designs.

Four Lens Strategies at a Glance

The series uses four primary examples because they pursue different goals:

LensStrategy
Nikon Nikkor Z 135mm f/1.8 S PlenaA fixed modern design that strongly controls the residual across a very large aperture
Minolta Varisoft Rokkor 85mm f/2.8A variable soft-focus lens that changes the in-focus subject from concentrated to core-and-halo rendering
Nikon AF DC-Nikkor 135mm f/2DA defocus-control lens that changes foreground–background rendering while retaining a concentrated subject
Voigtländer Portrait Heliar 75mm f/1.8A current lens with an explicit under–sharp–over spherical-aberration control

These lenses should not be treated as interchangeable examples of "good bokeh." One changes subject softness, another changes the preferred side of defocus, another spans undercorrection through overcorrection, and the Plena serves as a fixed-correction baseline. The mechanism and design goal matter more than the marketing category.

The Main Point

Spherical aberration is not adequately described by asking whether it is present. Every practical lens has some state-dependent residual. The useful questions are where that residual lies in the pupil, how it changes with aperture and focus, what other aberrations accompany it, and whether its distribution serves the intended photograph.

Begin with the concise photographer-focused guide, or proceed directly to the full technical article.

Bibliography

Footnotes

  1. R. Kingslake and R. B. Johnson, Lens Design Fundamentals, 2nd ed. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Academic Press, 2010.

  2. W. T. Welford, Aberrations of Optical Systems. Bristol, U.K.: Adam Hilger, 1986. 2

  3. M. Yanagisawa, "Optical system having a variable out-of-focus state," U.S. Patent 4,908,639, Mar. 13, 1990. [Online]. Available: https://patents.google.com/patent/US4908639A/en. [Accessed: Aug. 7, 2026].